Sport-T-Peg

“That’s Not Art!”–And How I Realized It Doesn’t Matter

by Daric M. Gill
What You’re Really Trying To Say

We like to think that when we say, “That’s Not Art!” we are stating something of personal or scholarly merit– As if to say, “I know what art is… and that isn’t it.” However, that’s rarely what we are actually trying to say. The aim of this article is to help artists, musicians, writers, and the like find a mutual navigation point from which a more constructive resolution can be formed. Read onward for more.

“That’s Not Art!”—  I clutched onto that belief longer than most artists. Then I realized it didn’t matter. What a relief!

Geodesic Ball: Flexible conduit & PVC connectors
Geodesic Ball: A collaboration between children, Darren Thompson, & myself

After 2 college degrees in art, years of experience as an art college educator, participating as a community educator, and existing as a professional artist in the real world– I’ve come to realize that this statement generally is nothing more than a grandiose overstatement of something far simpler:

“I don’t like it… AT ALL!”

If you’re an art student reading this you’ll probably cite a number of readings defining ideas of beauty and art. Believe me, I’ve seen it all. And I’ve seen all of the counter arguments (which is a point I’ll expand on later).  Yet, after the dust of all that semantic debate settles one can’t escape that there’s an overwhelming co-dependency between one’s position that something is NOT ART and that same person’s position to NOT LIKE it.

Undue Stress & The Wrong Question
Image source here
“No. 5, 1948”, Jackson Pollock. Image source here

There’s so much personal stress, anxiety, and angst that resides in this debate. If you don’t believe me, pay close attention next time this topic comes up. Watch as the tensions rise and the nostrils flare from the people debating the artness of something. It’s almost as if there’s a debate pertaining to beliefs and perspectives. Foreshadowing anyone? When this debate happens, step back a second and then ask your self some questions:

Will anything be immediately different if non-art becomes sanctioned as art; or vise versa? After you’ve announced that a Jackson Pollock piece is “something your kid could do”, will there be a rush of museum minions who hurry the piece out back and burn it? No, of course not. One can argue that something is art while another person can come along and argue the exact opposite. Whether it is or isn’t art is sort of moot point, isn’t it? It’s in a gallery and presented as such. My suggestion is to think about what makes it good art or bad art rather than debating if it is art.

Like Vs. Appreciate

This is an excerpt from my article titled, “7 Tips For Approaching Artwork”:

“Believe it or not, whether you like a piece of art doesn’t really impact the ‘artness’ of it. It’s indeed OK if you don’t like something after you’ve considered why other people might. Learn how to appreciate aspects of the work even if (maybe especially if) you don’t actually like it as a whole.”

“I often put it this way: Let’s say you went to a world-class restaurant and ordered their most celebrated entrée. It just so happens they are most renowned for their caviar and you’ve never been a big fan of caviar. Is it less of a dish because you don’t like it–Even if the rest of the world says it’s fantastic?”

But It’s NOT Art!

I see the skilled devil’s advocate looking around and naming random items. Is this art? What about that? To the novice, you might have a point. In this argument the notion of random thoughts or things being questioned into artdome seems rather fantastical. And maybe it is. None-the-less, the simple act of questioning the artness of something starts an intellectual engine running that could argue effectively the aesthetic merit, social/political statements presented, and/or compositional placement of said object.

leafMore practically stated: My guess is that most people have picked up a leaf or something else they’ve found on the ground and marveled at its beauty. What they’ve done is unintentionally calculated in a vague way the aesthetic beauty in the mundane. They haven’t chosen to see the art in the object, but rather they’re viewing the object through the filter of the artistic mindset. That my friends, is why debating ‘art’ is a dual of perspectives and beliefs. Perspectives and beliefs aren’t quantifiable equations or definitions. Love, beauty, religion, hate, politics, and … art. Their relative perspectives are intangible. The beliefs associated define the noun, not the other way around.

The Paradox Of Tradition

There’s a tagline on my local NPR station that goes something like this, “Composers Datebook. Reminding you that all music was once new”. This should be reiterated on behalf of artists too. All art was once new. Once questioned. Once sanctioned as non-art by the educated, the stoic, or the traditionalists.

Free thinkers and artists, this is my challenge: I’m not against the intellectual debate that art and non-art can’t do battle in the right context. Having said that, nothing is harmed if one agrees that the right person can view anything as full of art. Save the intellectual battle for the moments that require it. For all of the other moments, find the inner vocabulary and insight that describes your criteria for what makes good art & bad art. This can only lend credibility to your argument if/when the real debate comes about.

Maybe by then, it won’t even matter to you…

Advertisements

3 thoughts on ““That’s Not Art!”–And How I Realized It Doesn’t Matter

  1. Excellently put again Daric! I believe it to be more valuable to find the “art” in the “non-art” as a matter of appreciating unintentional moments of artistry than to find the “non-art” in pieces of things presented as art–and in fact can’t help but notice these within the minutiae of daily life. A poignant cadence to an eloquent orator’s delivery, the writer who chose that specific word that so perfectly represents the thought that I’m certain no other word from a sea of words could have ever sufficed, why one table looks more inviting than another, why something tastes so good.

    Whatever the case–there’s that moment, that thing, of unexpected above-averageness that connotes some sort of artistry– of words, of design, of craftsmanship, or conventional art.

    For conventional art, I feel like the recipient is part of the evaluation. For those moments when I can’t connect to a piece, I assume I’ve missed the message. That may be because the artist didn’t convey it effectively, or maybe I don’t have the frame of reference to appreciate its nuances. In any case, I’m part of that equation, and if I was unnameable to the message, that says more about me than a given piece. We can both live comfortably in that world.

    Like anything creative– a song, a poem, a story, a work of art (or your fellow human beings!)– somebody will connect to it strongly while others (maybe even most) see nothing special or are downright alienated by it.

  2. I agree wholly. . . but after contemplating this idea myself for many years would pose the inquiry that doesn’t art come down to the word “make”? Some entity makes art, art doesn’t exist. Its the choice of the so called “artist” or quite possibly the “viewer” to choose what is art. And what then differentiates and “artist” from a “viewer”? As an artist wouldn’t I VIEW what I am capable of MAKING as “art”? In my mind the argument would thus become not “what is art?”, but “what is an artist?” By admiring the beauty of a leaf, does it make the tree an artist? Does it make me the artist if I put it on display for others to ponder the beauty? If I choose to put the the leaf on display I am displaying the CHOICE I made, since I obviously did not make the beauty that exists in leaf. At that point, everything comes down to choice and making a choice, isn’t necessarily making art, and making art, isn’t necessarily the right choice.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s